首页> 外文OA文献 >Shifting from glucose diagnosis to the new HbA1c diagnosis reduces the capability of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) to screen for glucose abnormalities within a real-life primary healthcare preventive strategy.
【2h】

Shifting from glucose diagnosis to the new HbA1c diagnosis reduces the capability of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) to screen for glucose abnormalities within a real-life primary healthcare preventive strategy.

机译:从葡萄糖诊断转移到新的HbA1c诊断会降低芬兰糖尿病风险评分(FINDRISC)在现实的初级保健预防策略中筛查葡萄糖异常的能力。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: To investigate differences in the performance of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) as a screening tool for glucose abnormalities after shifting from glucose-based diagnostic criteria to the proposed new hemoglobin (Hb)A1c-based criteria. METHODS: A cross-sectional primary-care study was conducted as the first part of an active real-life lifestyle intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes within a high-risk Spanish Mediterranean population. Individuals without diabetes aged 45-75 years (n = 3,120) were screened using the FINDRISC. Where feasible, a subsequent 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test and HbA1c test were also carried out (n = 1,712). The performance of the risk score was calculated by applying the area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver operating characteristic, using three sets of criteria (2-hour glucose, fasting glucose, HbA1c) and three diagnostic categories (normal, pre-diabetes, diabetes). RESULTS: Defining diabetes by a single HbA1c measurement resulted in a significantly lower diabetes prevalence (3.6%) compared with diabetes defined by 2-hour plasma glucose (9.2%), but was not significantly lower than that obtained using fasting plasma glucose (3.1%). The FINDRISC at a cut-off of 14 had a reasonably high ability to predict diabetes using the diagnostic criteria of 2-hour or fasting glucose (AUC = 0.71) or all glucose abnormalities (AUC = 0.67 and 0.69, respectively). When HbA1c was used as the primary diagnostic criterion, the AUC for diabetes detection dropped to 0.67 (5.6% reduction in comparison with either 2-hour or fasting glucose) and fell to 0.55 for detection of all glucose abnormalities (17.9% and 20.3% reduction, respectively), with a relevant decrease in sensitivity of the risk score. CONCLUSIONS: A shift from glucose-based diagnosis to HbA1c-based diagnosis substantially reduces the ability of the FINDRISC to screen for glucose abnormalities when applied in this real-life primary-care preventive strategy.
机译:背景:为了研究从基于葡萄糖的诊断标准转向拟议的基于血红蛋白(Hb)A1c的新标准后,芬兰糖尿病风险评分(FINDRISC)作为葡萄糖异常筛查工具的性能差异。方法:进行横断面初级保健研究,作为积极的生活方式干预措施的第一部分,以预防高风险的西班牙地中海人群中的2型糖尿病。使用FINDRISC对年龄在45-75岁(n = 3120)的无糖尿病个体进行筛查。在可行的情况下,还进行了随后的2小时口服葡萄糖耐量测试和HbA1c测试(n = 1,712)。通过使用三组标准(2小时血糖,空腹血糖,HbA1c)和三种诊断类别(正常,糖尿病前期),通过应用接收者操作特征的曲线下面积(AUC)来计算风险得分的表现,糖尿病)。结果:与通过2小时血浆葡萄糖定义的糖尿病(9.2%)相比,通过一次HbA1c测量来定义糖尿病的糖尿病患病率显着降低(3.6%),但并不比使用空腹血浆葡萄糖获得的糖尿病患病率(3.​​1%)显着降低)。使用2小时或空腹血糖(AUC = 0.71)或所有葡萄糖异常(AUC = 0.67和0.69)的诊断标准,FINDRISC截止值为14时具有相当高的预测糖尿病的能力。当将HbA1c用作主要诊断标准时,糖尿病检测的AUC降至0.67(与2小时或空腹血糖相比降低5.6%),而对所有葡萄糖异常的检测降至0.55(降低17.9%和20.3%) ),从而降低了风险评分的敏感性。结论:从基于葡萄糖的诊断转变为基于HbA1c的诊断后,当将FINDRISC应用于现实的初级保健预防策略时,会大大降低FINDRISC筛查葡萄糖异常的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号